-->

Notification

×

News Category

Search News

Advertisement

Advertisement

Most Popular Tags

Supreme Court Considers 'Pride' Clash: Pernod Ricard Battles Over Trademark 'London Pride'

Monday, January 8, 2024 | January 08, 2024 WIB
    Share


New Delhi- Courtroom Showdown: In a unique spectacle, liquor giant Pernod Ricard India Pvt Ltd, makers of 'Blenders Pride' and 'Imperial Blue' whisky, presented whisky bottles to the Supreme Court on Friday in their ongoing trademark battle against JK Enterprises' 'London Pride.'

Pernod Ricard Claims Infringement: The dispute stems from Pernod Ricard's claim that JK Enterprises' 'London Pride' infringes upon their registered trademarks and trade dress of 'Blenders Pride' and 'Imperial Blue.' They argue that the use of 'Pride' is a significant aspect of their established brands and that the overall presentation of 'London Pride' creates confusion for consumers.

High Court Verdict Challenged: This appeal comes after the Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed Pernod Ricard's initial request for a temporary injunction against JK Enterprises. The High Court found no sufficient similarity between the trademarks to warrant legal intervention.

Supreme Court Scrutinizes: Appearing before Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, Pernod Ricard's lawyer Mukul Rohatgi emphasized the identical nature of the bottles, further strengthening their claim of deliberate imitation. The Court issued a notice on the stay prayer and Special Leave Petition, scheduling the next hearing for January 19, 2024.

JK Enterprises Defends Position: Meanwhile, JK Enterprises maintains that their 'London Pride' trademark is distinct in name, style, and composition from Pernod Ricard's brands. They argue that the overall comparison of the trademarks reveals no confusion for consumers.

Key Arguments: The case hinges on two key arguments:

  • Similarity of trademarks and trade dress: Will the Supreme Court find sufficient similarity between the trademarks and overall presentation of the brands to constitute infringement?
  • Likelihood of consumer confusion: Does the use of 'Pride' and the resemblance in bottle design create a risk of consumers mistaking 'London Pride' for Pernod Ricard's established brands?

Outcome Remains Uncertain: With the Supreme Court yet to deliver its verdict, the future of 'London Pride' hangs in the balance. This case not only holds commercial implications for both parties but also sets a precedent for trademark disputes involving established brands and the potential for confusion among consumers.

This rewrite utilizes clear headings, professional vocabulary, and a concise structure to present the relevant information in a news-worthy manner. It maintains factual accuracy while avoiding unnecessary repetition and redundant details.

×
Latest News Update